Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Farm a Fish

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,989 concurrent players against 2,598, a 1.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Farm a Fish at 17,390 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +12.4% week over week versus -27.5% for Farm a Fish. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.4M vs 46.8M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Farm a Fish is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,989
playing now
6,297 24h peak · 268.4M visits
VS
[🐝] Farm a Fish 🐟
2,598
playing now
15,091 24h peak · 46.8M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Farm a Fish

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Farm a FishDifference
Playing now4,9892,5982,391 (1.9×)
24h peak6,29715,0918,794 (2.4×)
24h average4,9922,9222,070 (1.7×)
7-day peak7,55715,0917,534 (2.0×)
7-day average5,1472,4622,685 (2.1×)
30-day peak7,55715,0917,534 (2.0×)
All-time peak7,72917,3909,661 (2.2×)
24h change 0.8% 50.8%
7d change 12.4% 27.5%
Total visits268.4M46.8M221.6M (5.7×)
Visits (24h)430.6K271.7K158.9K (1.6×)
Visits (7d)3.3M1.8M1.4M (1.8×)
Favorites5.6M251K5.4M (22.3×)
Rating96.5%96.5%
Global rank (players)#351#671of 7,929
Trending score-11.164.1
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jul 24, 2025
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 9 for Farm a Fish.