Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Lucky Dumplings

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,989 concurrent players against 4,039. On all-time peak the record belongs to Lucky Dumplings at 15,138 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +12.4% week over week versus +2.7% for Lucky Dumplings. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.4M vs 40.6M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Lucky Dumplings is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,989
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.4M visits
VS
Lucky Dumplings
4,039
playing now
15,138 24h peak Β· 40.6M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Lucky Dumplings

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Lucky DumplingsDifference
Playing now4,9894,039950
24h peak6,29715,1388,841 (2.4Γ—)
24h average4,9925,835843
7-day peak7,55715,1387,581 (2.0Γ—)
7-day average5,1474,834313
30-day peak7,55715,1387,581 (2.0Γ—)
All-time peak7,72915,1387,409 (2.0Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 0.8%β–² 14.2%β€”
7d changeβ–² 12.4%β–² 2.7%β€”
Total visits268.4M40.6M227.8M (6.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)430.6K753.8K323.2K (1.8Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M3.9M671.7K
Favorites5.6M3.5M2.1M (1.6Γ—)
Rating96.5%96.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#351#432of 7,929
Trending score-11.177.6β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 4, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 12 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 13 for Lucky Dumplings.