Build to Survive [TESTING] vs FUT [OPEN!]

FUT [OPEN!] currently leads with 5,572 concurrent players against 4,606. On all-time peak the record belongs to FUT [OPEN!] at 9,146 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours FUT [OPEN!]: +4611.3% week over week versus +13.1% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.3M vs 22.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and FUT [OPEN!] is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,606
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.3M visits
VS
FUT ⚽ [OPEN!] πŸŽ‰
5,572
playing now
6,053 24h peak Β· 22.3M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]FUT [OPEN!]

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] FUT [OPEN!]Difference
Playing now4,6065,572966
24h peak6,2976,053244
24h average4,9994,755244
7-day peak7,5578,8371,280
7-day average5,1622,9212,241 (1.8Γ—)
30-day peak7,5578,8371,280
All-time peak7,7299,1461,417
24h changeβ–² 0.5%β–² 41.5%β€”
7d changeβ–² 13.1%β–² >999%β€”
Total visits268.3M22.3M246M (12.0Γ—)
Visits (24h)423.7K513.3K89.5K
Visits (7d)3.3M2.7M538.3K
Favorites5.6M88.8K5.5M (63.1Γ—)
Rating96.5%90.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#366#302of 7,866
Trending score-11.6229.0β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jan 7, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSports & Racingβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 11 for FUT [OPEN!].