Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [24H] +1 Muscle Evolution

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,860 concurrent players against 4,042. On all-time peak the record belongs to [24H] +1 Muscle Evolution at 14,285 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +13.4% week over week versus -23.8% for [24H] +1 Muscle Evolution. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.3M vs 53M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [24H] +1 Muscle Evolution is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,860
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.3M visits
VS
[24H] +1 Muscle Evolution
4,042
playing now
5,461 24h peak Β· 53M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING][24H] +1 Muscle Evolution

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] [24H] +1 Muscle EvolutionDifference
Playing now4,8604,042818
24h peak6,2975,461836
24h average5,0244,322702
7-day peak7,5578,8201,263
7-day average5,1695,550381
30-day peak7,55711,5383,981 (1.5Γ—)
All-time peak7,72914,2856,556 (1.8Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 0.7%β–Ό 4.0%β€”
7d changeβ–² 13.4%β–Ό 23.8%β€”
Total visits268.3M53M215.3M (5.1Γ—)
Visits (24h)429.2K562.2K133K
Visits (7d)3.3M5.2M1.9M (1.6Γ—)
Favorites5.6M1.2M4.4M (4.6Γ—)
Rating96.5%98.9%β€”
Global rank (players)#366#458of 7,866
Trending score-10.3-80.1β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021May 30, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for [24H] +1 Muscle Evolution.