Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Tree RNG

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,345 concurrent players against 2,287, a 1.9Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 5,785. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 8.7M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Tree RNG is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,345
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 268M visits
VS
Tree RNG
2,287
playing now
5,785 24h peak Β· 8.7M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Tree RNG

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Tree RNGDifference
Playing now4,3452,2872,058 (1.9Γ—)
24h peak6,2245,785439
24h average4,8862,6692,217 (1.8Γ—)
7-day peak7,5575,7851,772
7-day average5,1792,1193,060 (2.4Γ—)
30-day peak7,5575,7851,772
All-time peak7,7295,7851,944
24h changeβ–Ό 4.8%β–² 37.0%β€”
7d changeβ–² 16.0%β€”β€”
Total visits268M8.7M259.3M (30.8Γ—)
Visits (24h)432.4K179K253.4K (2.4Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M730.3K2.6M (4.6Γ—)
Favorites5.6M23.7K5.6M (235.9Γ—)
Rating96.5%96.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#357#654of 7,707
Trending score-20.887.9β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Mar 25, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 6 for Tree RNG.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Tree RNG β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals