Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Cold War [MOUNTED MGs]

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,502 concurrent players against 3,625. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 5,978. Momentum favours Cold War [MOUNTED MGs]: +98.5% week over week versus +16.2% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 25.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Cold War [MOUNTED MGs] is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,502
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 268M visits
VS
Cold War [MOUNTED MGs]
3,625
playing now
5,535 24h peak Β· 25.1M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Cold War [MOUNTED MGs]

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Cold War [MOUNTED MGs]Difference
Playing now4,5023,625877
24h peak6,2245,535689
24h average4,9134,118795
7-day peak7,5575,8001,757
7-day average5,1873,9171,270
30-day peak7,5575,8001,757
All-time peak7,7295,9781,751
24h changeβ–Ό 4.3%β–² 0.5%β€”
7d changeβ–² 16.2%β–² 98.5%β€”
Total visits268M25.1M242.9M (10.7Γ—)
Visits (24h)431.2K286.1K145.1K (1.5Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M1.8M1.5M (1.9Γ—)
Favorites5.6M139.1K5.5M (40.2Γ—)
Rating96.5%79.2%β€”
Global rank (players)#349#438of 7,662
Trending score-19.418.4β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 8, 2023β€”
GenreSurvivalShooterβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Cold War [MOUNTED MGs].

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Cold War [MOUNTED MGs] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals