Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Hide or OOF!

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,989 concurrent players against 3,169, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 7,360. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +12.4% week over week versus +3.4% for Hide or OOF!. Lifetime, Hide or OOF! has more visits (788.5M vs 268.4M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Hide or OOF! is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,989
playing now
6,297 24h peak · 268.4M visits
VS
💀 Hide or OOF!
3,169
playing now
5,214 24h peak · 788.5M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Hide or OOF!

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Hide or OOF!Difference
Playing now4,9893,1691,820 (1.6×)
24h peak6,2975,2141,083
24h average4,9923,8401,152
7-day peak7,5577,166391
7-day average5,1474,290857
30-day peak7,5577,360197
All-time peak7,7297,360369
24h change 0.8% 1.0%
7d change 12.4% 3.4%
Total visits268.4M788.5M520.1M (2.9×)
Visits (24h)430.6K624.6K194K
Visits (7d)3.3M4.7M1.4M
Favorites5.6M9.7M4M (1.7×)
Rating96.5%86.5%
Global rank (players)#351#595of 7,929
Trending score-11.1-37.4
CreatedAug 12, 2021Aug 4, 2024
GenreSurvivalParty & Casual

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 13 for Hide or OOF!.