Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [UPD] Soccer Stars 26

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,738 concurrent players against 4,228. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 7,268. Momentum favours [UPD] Soccer Stars 26: +91.0% week over week versus +11.8% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.5M vs 39.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [UPD] Soccer Stars 26 is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,738
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.5M visits
VS
[UPD] Soccer Stars 26
4,228
playing now
6,071 24h peak Β· 39.3M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING][UPD] Soccer Stars 26

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] [UPD] Soccer Stars 26Difference
Playing now4,7384,228510
24h peak6,2976,071226
24h average4,9924,745247
7-day peak7,5577,199358
7-day average5,1334,320813
30-day peak7,5577,199358
All-time peak7,7297,268461
24h changeβ–Ό 0.8%β–Ό 7.3%β€”
7d changeβ–² 11.8%β–² 91.0%β€”
Total visits268.5M39.3M229.2M (6.8Γ—)
Visits (24h)441.2K1.1M661.8K (2.5Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M6.8M3.6M (2.1Γ—)
Favorites5.6M780.4K4.8M (7.2Γ—)
Rating96.5%80.9%β€”
Global rank (players)#359#405of 7,929
Trending score-10.136.0β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 1, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSports & Racingβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 12 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 13 for [UPD] Soccer Stars 26.