Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Carry Puzzles (Teamwork Obby)

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 3,918 concurrent players against 1,948, a 2.0Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 6,072 concurrent players, versus 3,908. Lifetime, Carry Puzzles (Teamwork Obby) has more visits (514.8M vs 264.6M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Carry Puzzles (Teamwork Obby) is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
3,918
playing now
6,072 24h peak Β· 264.6M visits
VS
Carry Puzzles (Teamwork Obby)
1,948
playing now
2,792 24h peak Β· 514.8M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Carry Puzzles (Teamwork Obby)

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Carry Puzzles (Teamwork Obby)Difference
Playing now3,9181,9481,970 (2.0Γ—)
24h peak6,0722,7923,280 (2.2Γ—)
24h average4,5572,1562,401 (2.1Γ—)
7-day peak6,0723,9082,164 (1.6Γ—)
7-day average4,4252,5031,922 (1.8Γ—)
30-day peak6,0723,9082,164 (1.6Γ—)
All-time peak6,0723,9082,164 (1.6Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 9.5%β–Ό 5.6%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits264.6M514.8M250.2M (1.9Γ—)
Visits (24h)406.3K359.6K46.7K
Visits (7d)1M1.4M399.8K
Favorites5.5M31.8M26.2M (5.7Γ—)
Rating96.5%55.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#434#833of 4,381
Trending score10.9-45.8β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Aug 26, 2023β€”
GenreSurvivalObby & Platformerβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 5 for Carry Puzzles (Teamwork Obby).

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Carry Puzzles (Teamwork Obby) β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals