Build to Survive [TESTING] vs +1 Backflip for VIRAL Squishy!

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,204 concurrent players against 2,194, a 1.9Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 6,072 concurrent players, versus 4,200. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (264.6M vs 5.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and +1 Backflip for VIRAL Squishy! is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,204
playing now
6,072 24h peak Β· 264.6M visits
VS
+1 Backflip for VIRAL Squishy!
2,194
playing now
3,048 24h peak Β· 5.5M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]+1 Backflip for VIRAL Squishy!

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] +1 Backflip for VIRAL Squishy!Difference
Playing now4,2042,1942,010 (1.9Γ—)
24h peak6,0723,0483,024 (2.0Γ—)
24h average4,5662,1612,405 (2.1Γ—)
7-day peak6,0723,9092,163 (1.6Γ—)
7-day average4,4262,5191,907 (1.8Γ—)
30-day peak6,0723,9092,163 (1.6Γ—)
All-time peak6,0724,2001,872
24h changeβ–² 8.9%β–Ό 21.7%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits264.6M5.5M259.1M (48.4Γ—)
Visits (24h)404.4K213.8K190.5K (1.9Γ—)
Visits (7d)1M500.1K514.7K (2.0Γ—)
Favorites5.5M365.3K5.2M (15.1Γ—)
Rating96.5%93.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#399#799of 4,381
Trending score11.5-47.0β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 8, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 4 for +1 Backflip for VIRAL Squishy!.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs +1 Backflip for VIRAL Squishy! β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals