Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Run or Die!

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,591 concurrent players against 2,711, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 5,727. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.1M vs 3.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Run or Die! is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,591
playing now
6,224 24h peak · 268.1M visits
VS
💀 Run or Die!
2,711
playing now
5,727 24h peak · 3.1M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Run or Die!

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Run or Die!Difference
Playing now4,5912,7111,880 (1.7×)
24h peak6,2245,727497
24h average4,9053,6311,274
7-day peak7,5575,7271,830
7-day average5,1733,2861,887 (1.6×)
30-day peak7,5575,7271,830
All-time peak7,7295,7272,002
24h change 4.7% 0.7%
7d change 15.5%
Total visits268.1M3.1M265M (87.2×)
Visits (24h)420.2K444.3K24.1K
Visits (7d)3.3M1.6M1.7M (2.0×)
Favorites5.6M143.2K5.5M (39.1×)
Rating96.5%65.7%
Global rank (players)#342#607of 7,707
Trending score-19.037.1
CreatedAug 12, 2021May 27, 2026
GenreSurvivalSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 6 for Run or Die!.