Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Build a Zoo

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,614 concurrent players against 3,563. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build a Zoo at 13,063 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +15.4% week over week versus -7.1% for Build a Zoo. Lifetime, Build a Zoo has more visits (521.1M vs 268.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Build a Zoo is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,614
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 268.1M visits
VS
[🌌]Build a ZooπŸ†
3,563
playing now
4,093 24h peak Β· 521.1M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Build a Zoo

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Build a ZooDifference
Playing now4,6143,5631,051
24h peak6,2244,0932,131 (1.5Γ—)
24h average4,8413,6641,177
7-day peak7,5575,7291,828
7-day average5,1613,8561,305
30-day peak7,5575,7291,828
All-time peak7,72913,0635,334 (1.7Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 6.1%β–Ό 6.7%β€”
7d changeβ–² 15.4%β–Ό 7.1%β€”
Total visits268.1M521.1M253M (1.9Γ—)
Visits (24h)417.8K253.1K164.7K (1.7Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M2.1M1.2M (1.6Γ—)
Favorites5.6M3M2.6M (1.8Γ—)
Rating96.5%96.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#350#436of 7,707
Trending score-22.7-17.6β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jul 4, 2025β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Build a Zoo.