Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Duck Duck (Tag)
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,241 concurrent players against 1,236, a 3.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Duck Duck (Tag) at 9,777 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +12.5% week over week versus +6.6% for Duck Duck (Tag). Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.3M vs 16.8M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Duck Duck (Tag) is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,241
playing now
6,297 24h peak · 268.3M visits
VS
Duck Duck (Tag) 🦆
1,236
playing now
2,172 24h peak · 16.8M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive [TESTING]Duck Duck (Tag)
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Duck Duck (Tag) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,241 | 1,236 | 3,005 (3.4×) |
| 24h peak | 6,297 | 2,172 | 4,125 (2.9×) |
| 24h average | 4,875 | 1,478 | 3,397 (3.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,557 | 9,636 | 2,079 |
| 7-day average | 5,136 | 2,112 | 3,024 (2.4×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,557 | 9,636 | 2,079 |
| All-time peak | 7,729 | 9,777 | 2,048 |
| 24h change | ▼ 1.8% | ▼ 74.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 12.5% | ▲ 6.6% | — |
| Total visits | 268.3M | 16.8M | 251.6M (16.0×) |
| Visits (24h) | 421.3K | 196.6K | 224.7K (2.1×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.3M | 2.4M | 830.5K |
| Favorites | 5.6M | 127.7K | 5.5M (43.9×) |
| Rating | 96.5% | 89.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #375 | #1,159 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | -18.7 | -94.1 | — |
| Created | Aug 12, 2021 | Mar 2, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Party & Casual | — |
Other comparisons
Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [SUSPENSION!]Midnight Chasers: Highway RacingBuild to Survive [TESTING] vs Build an ASMR TowerBuild to Survive [TESTING] vs Giga Mansion TycoonBuild to Survive [TESTING] vs Soccer: Touch FootballBuild to Survive [TESTING] vs Blackhawk Rescue Mission 5Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Strike: WarfareCompare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 11 for Duck Duck (Tag).