Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Strike: Warfare

Strike: Warfare currently leads with 5,088 concurrent players against 4,200. On all-time peak the record belongs to Strike: Warfare at 9,661 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Strike: Warfare: +18.2% week over week versus +12.0% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.4M vs 39.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Strike: Warfare is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,200
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.4M visits
VS
Strike: Warfare
5,088
playing now
8,761 24h peak Β· 39.3M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Strike: Warfare

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Strike: WarfareDifference
Playing now4,2005,088888
24h peak6,2978,7612,464
24h average4,7396,1201,381
7-day peak7,5579,6232,066
7-day average5,1106,3961,286
30-day peak7,5579,6232,066
All-time peak7,7299,6611,932
24h changeβ–Ό 4.5%β–Ό 9.9%β€”
7d changeβ–² 12.0%β–² 18.2%β€”
Total visits268.4M39.3M229M (6.8Γ—)
Visits (24h)436K760.6K324.6K (1.7Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M5.3M2M (1.6Γ—)
Favorites5.6M101.1K5.5M (55.4Γ—)
Rating96.5%88.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#382#310of 7,866
Trending score-26.6-16.3β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Apr 28, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalShooterβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Strike: Warfare.