Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Boxywood RP

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,406 concurrent players against 2,560, a 1.7Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 5,770. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +15.4% week over week versus -9.3% for Boxywood RP. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 192.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Boxywood RP is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,406
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 268M visits
VS
Boxywood 🏠🌴 RP
2,560
playing now
4,420 24h peak Β· 192.3M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Boxywood RP

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Boxywood RPDifference
Playing now4,4062,5601,846 (1.7Γ—)
24h peak6,2244,4201,804
24h average4,8183,1531,665 (1.5Γ—)
7-day peak7,5575,7381,819
7-day average5,1573,3821,775 (1.5Γ—)
30-day peak7,5575,7381,819
All-time peak7,7295,7701,959
24h changeβ–Ό 6.7%β–Ό 3.3%β€”
7d changeβ–² 15.4%β–Ό 9.3%β€”
Total visits268M192.3M75.7M
Visits (24h)420.8K341.6K79.2K
Visits (7d)3.3M2.5M812K
Favorites5.6M6.3M737.2K
Rating96.5%87.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#352#586of 7,707
Trending score-24.1-23.5β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021May 18, 2023β€”
GenreSurvivalRoleplay & Avatar Simβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Boxywood RP.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Boxywood RP β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals