Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Build and Survive

Build and Survive currently leads with 5,371 concurrent players against 4,787. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build and Survive at 7,955 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Build and Survive: +33.2% week over week versus +18.6% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (267.5M vs 230M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Build and Survive is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,787
playing now
6,773 24h peak Β· 267.5M visits
VS
πŸ› οΈBuild and Survive
5,371
playing now
7,955 24h peak Β· 230M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Build and Survive

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Build and SurviveDifference
Playing now4,7875,371584
24h peak6,7737,9551,182
24h average5,1555,351196
7-day peak7,5577,955398
7-day average5,2044,1041,100
30-day peak7,5577,955398
All-time peak7,7297,955226
24h changeβ–² 9.3%β–² 56.3%β€”
7d changeβ–² 18.6%β–² 33.2%β€”
Total visits267.5M230M37.5M
Visits (24h)441.4K436.1K5.3K
Visits (7d)3.3M2.6M753.7K
Favorites5.6M8M2.5M
Rating96.5%96.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#291#261of 7,126
Trending score-3.5112.6β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Mar 25, 2025β€”
GenreSurvivalSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 9 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 9 for Build and Survive.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Build and Survive β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals