Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Build and Crush

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,820 concurrent players against 3,666. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build and Crush at 7,973 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (267.5M vs 11.9M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Build and Crush is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,820
playing now
6,773 24h peak Β· 267.5M visits
VS
Build and Crush
3,666
playing now
7,257 24h peak Β· 11.9M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Build and Crush

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Build and CrushDifference
Playing now4,8203,6661,154
24h peak6,7737,257484
24h average5,1554,482673
7-day peak7,5577,953396
7-day average5,2044,1231,081
30-day peak7,5577,953396
All-time peak7,7297,973244
24h changeβ–² 9.3%β–Ό 8.0%β€”
7d changeβ–² 18.6%β€”β€”
Total visits267.5M11.9M255.6M (22.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)441.4K303.3K138.1K
Visits (7d)3.3M1.5M1.9M (2.3Γ—)
Favorites5.6M427.8K5.2M (13.1Γ—)
Rating96.5%93.2%β€”
Global rank (players)#291#425of 7,126
Trending score-3.531.6β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Sep 15, 2025β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 9 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 6 for Build and Crush.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Build and Crush β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals