[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death vs [] Feed And Fight

[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death currently leads with 6,788 concurrent players against 360, a 18.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death at 10,397 concurrent players, versus 453. Lifetime, [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death has more visits (323.3M vs 3M). Full side-by-side history for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death and [] Feed And Fight is charted above.

[⏰FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
6,788
playing now
9,614 24h peak · 323.3M visits
VS
[🦘] Feed And Fight
360
playing now
453 24h peak · 3M visits

Player count history

[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death[] Feed And Fight

Head to head

Metric [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death [] Feed And FightDifference
Playing now6,7883606,428 (18.9×)
24h peak9,6144539,161 (21.2×)
24h average7,2222736,949 (26.5×)
7-day peak10,3664539,913 (22.9×)
7-day average7,5442337,311 (32.4×)
30-day peak10,3664539,913 (22.9×)
All-time peak10,3974539,944 (23.0×)
24h change 15.3% 32.5%
7d change
Total visits323.3M3M320.3M (108.9×)
Visits (24h)552.7K18.8K533.9K (29.3×)
Visits (7d)3.6M71.7K3.5M (49.7×)
Favorites635.9K5.7K630.1K (111.2×)
Rating87.4%93.7%
Global rank (players)#265#2,339of 5,679
Trending score-16.438.0
CreatedMar 8, 2025Feb 20, 2026
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 7 days for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death, 5 for [] Feed And Fight.

[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death vs [] Feed And Fight — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals