[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death vs Homer Nightmares [HORROR]

[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death currently leads with 7,852 concurrent players against 4,125, a 1.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Homer Nightmares [HORROR] at 10,890 concurrent players, versus 10,397. Momentum favours [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death: -12.7% week over week versus -46.1% for Homer Nightmares [HORROR]. Lifetime, [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death has more visits (326M vs 10.2M). Full side-by-side history for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death and Homer Nightmares [HORROR] is charted above.

[⏰FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
7,852
playing now
10,142 24h peak · 326M visits
VS
Homer Nightmares [HORROR]
4,125
playing now
3,988 24h peak · 10.2M visits

Player count history

[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of DeathHomer Nightmares [HORROR]

Head to head

Metric [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death Homer Nightmares [HORROR]Difference
Playing now7,8524,1253,727 (1.9×)
24h peak10,1423,9886,154 (2.5×)
24h average6,7943,2473,547 (2.1×)
7-day peak10,1428,1761,966
7-day average6,5873,3853,202 (1.9×)
30-day peak10,14210,890748
All-time peak10,39710,890493
24h change 15.1% 29.5%
7d change 12.7% 46.1%
Total visits326M10.2M315.8M (31.9×)
Visits (24h)496.6K419.7K76.9K
Visits (7d)3.8M3.6M183.5K
Favorites639.5K663.9K24.4K
Rating87.3%79.8%
Global rank (players)#247#517of 7,866
Trending score12.0-14.2
CreatedMar 8, 2025Jun 15, 2026
GenreSurvivalAdventure

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death, 12 for Homer Nightmares [HORROR].