RODOGRAU 2.0 vs [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG
RODOGRAU 2.0 currently leads with 1,013 concurrent players against 381, a 2.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG at 3,249 concurrent players, versus 1,654. Momentum favours RODOGRAU 2.0: -8.9% week over week versus -23.9% for [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG. Lifetime, RODOGRAU 2.0 has more visits (30.1M vs 24.9M). Full side-by-side history for RODOGRAU 2.0 and [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG is charted above.
🗽 RODOGRAU 2.0
1,013
playing now
1,559 24h peak · 30.1M visits
VS
[⛈️THUNDERSTORM]🎲 EMOTE RNG
381
playing now
612 24h peak · 24.9M visits
Player count history
RODOGRAU 2.0[THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG
Head to head
| Metric | RODOGRAU 2.0 | [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,013 | 381 | 632 (2.7×) |
| 24h peak | 1,559 | 612 | 947 (2.5×) |
| 24h average | 1,136 | 478 | 658 (2.4×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,592 | 2,735 | 1,143 (1.7×) |
| 7-day average | 866 | 487 | 379 (1.8×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,654 | 2,735 | 1,081 (1.7×) |
| All-time peak | 1,654 | 3,249 | 1,595 (2.0×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 15.2% | ▼ 29.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 8.9% | ▼ 23.9% | — |
| Total visits | 30.1M | 24.9M | 5.2M |
| Visits (24h) | 129.4K | 44.2K | 85.2K (2.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 777.4K | 291K | 486.4K (2.7×) |
| Favorites | 503.7K | 37.7K | 466K (13.4×) |
| Rating | 87.3% | 88.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,199 | #2,165 | of 8,339 |
| Trending score | 92.7 | -4.7 | — |
| Created | Mar 8, 2026 | Aug 1, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for RODOGRAU 2.0, 14 for [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG.