RODOGRAU 2.0 vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] currently leads with 1,467 concurrent players against 1,237. On all-time peak the record belongs to Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] at 2,854 concurrent players, versus 1,654. Momentum favours Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]: +170.2% week over week versus -7.7% for RODOGRAU 2.0. Lifetime, RODOGRAU 2.0 has more visits (30.1M vs 4.5M). Full side-by-side history for RODOGRAU 2.0 and Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.
π½ RODOGRAU 2.0
1,237
playing now
1,559 24h peak Β· 30.1M visits
VS
[π] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
1,467
playing now
2,635 24h peak Β· 4.5M visits
Player count history
RODOGRAU 2.0Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Head to head
| Metric | RODOGRAU 2.0 | Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,237 | 1,467 | 230 |
| 24h peak | 1,559 | 2,635 | 1,076 (1.7Γ) |
| 24h average | 1,199 | 1,943 | 744 (1.6Γ) |
| 7-day peak | 1,592 | 2,734 | 1,142 (1.7Γ) |
| 7-day average | 878 | 1,878 | 1,000 (2.1Γ) |
| 30-day peak | 1,654 | 2,734 | 1,080 (1.7Γ) |
| All-time peak | 1,654 | 2,854 | 1,200 (1.7Γ) |
| 24h change | β² 21.6% | βΌ 15.9% | β |
| 7d change | βΌ 7.7% | β² 170.2% | β |
| Total visits | 30.1M | 4.5M | 25.5M (6.6Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 127.3K | 413K | 285.7K (3.2Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 773.4K | 3M | 2.2M (3.8Γ) |
| Favorites | 503.5K | 28.9K | 474.6K (17.4Γ) |
| Rating | 87.3% | 92.3% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #1,080 | #977 | of 8,339 |
| Trending score | 109.6 | 11.2 | β |
| Created | Mar 8, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 | β |
| Genre | Simulation | Strategy | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 14 days for RODOGRAU 2.0, 13 for Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].