RODOGRAU 2.0 vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]

Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] currently leads with 1,467 concurrent players against 1,237. On all-time peak the record belongs to Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] at 2,854 concurrent players, versus 1,654. Momentum favours Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]: +170.2% week over week versus -7.7% for RODOGRAU 2.0. Lifetime, RODOGRAU 2.0 has more visits (30.1M vs 4.5M). Full side-by-side history for RODOGRAU 2.0 and Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.

πŸ—½ RODOGRAU 2.0
1,237
playing now
1,559 24h peak Β· 30.1M visits
VS
[πŸ‘‘] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
1,467
playing now
2,635 24h peak Β· 4.5M visits

Player count history

RODOGRAU 2.0Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]

Head to head

Metric RODOGRAU 2.0 Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]Difference
Playing now1,2371,467230
24h peak1,5592,6351,076 (1.7Γ—)
24h average1,1991,943744 (1.6Γ—)
7-day peak1,5922,7341,142 (1.7Γ—)
7-day average8781,8781,000 (2.1Γ—)
30-day peak1,6542,7341,080 (1.7Γ—)
All-time peak1,6542,8541,200 (1.7Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 21.6%β–Ό 15.9%β€”
7d changeβ–Ό 7.7%β–² 170.2%β€”
Total visits30.1M4.5M25.5M (6.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)127.3K413K285.7K (3.2Γ—)
Visits (7d)773.4K3M2.2M (3.8Γ—)
Favorites503.5K28.9K474.6K (17.4Γ—)
Rating87.3%92.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,080#977of 8,339
Trending score109.611.2β€”
CreatedMar 8, 2026Jul 29, 2026β€”
GenreSimulationStrategyβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 14 days for RODOGRAU 2.0, 13 for Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].