Frigid Dusk vs [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death currently leads with 7,277 concurrent players against 4,516, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death at 10,397 concurrent players, versus 7,162. Momentum favours Frigid Dusk: +8.4% week over week versus -13.1% for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death. Lifetime, [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death has more visits (326.1M vs 91M). Full side-by-side history for Frigid Dusk and [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death is charted above.
Frigid Dusk
4,516
playing now
5,661 24h peak · 91M visits
VS
[⏰FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
7,277
playing now
10,142 24h peak · 326.1M visits
Player count history
Frigid Dusk[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
Head to head
| Metric | Frigid Dusk | [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,516 | 7,277 | 2,761 (1.6×) |
| 24h peak | 5,661 | 10,142 | 4,481 (1.8×) |
| 24h average | 4,327 | 6,853 | 2,526 (1.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 6,922 | 10,142 | 3,220 |
| 7-day average | 4,136 | 6,565 | 2,429 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 6,922 | 10,142 | 3,220 |
| All-time peak | 7,162 | 10,397 | 3,235 |
| 24h change | ▲ 23.5% | ▲ 15.6% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 8.4% | ▼ 13.1% | — |
| Total visits | 91M | 326.1M | 235.1M (3.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 314.8K | 503.8K | 189K (1.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 2.3M | 3.8M | 1.4M (1.6×) |
| Favorites | 951.8K | 639.5K | 312.3K |
| Rating | 82.6% | 87.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #376 | #238 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 16.7 | 16.8 | — |
| Created | Jun 6, 2021 | Mar 8, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Adventure | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Frigid Dusk, 12 for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death.