Build to Survive vs +1 Speed Slime Keyboard Escape
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,662 concurrent players against 1,182, a 3.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to +1 Speed Slime Keyboard Escape at 10,320 concurrent players, versus 7,252. Momentum favours Build to Survive: -5.5% week over week versus -42.1% for +1 Speed Slime Keyboard Escape. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (409.6M vs 124.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and +1 Speed Slime Keyboard Escape is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,662
playing now
6,972 24h peak · 409.6M visits
VS
+1 Speed Slime Keyboard Escape
1,182
playing now
1,464 24h peak · 124.1M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive+1 Speed Slime Keyboard Escape
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | +1 Speed Slime Keyboard Escape | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,662 | 1,182 | 3,480 (3.9×) |
| 24h peak | 6,972 | 1,464 | 5,508 (4.8×) |
| 24h average | 5,482 | 1,190 | 4,292 (4.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,086 | 4,186 | 2,900 (1.7×) |
| 7-day average | 5,021 | 1,737 | 3,284 (2.9×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,086 | 4,186 | 2,900 (1.7×) |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 10,320 | 3,068 |
| 24h change | ▼ 0.2% | ▼ 11.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 5.5% | ▼ 42.1% | — |
| Total visits | 409.6M | 124.1M | 285.5M (3.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 552K | 328.6K | 223.4K (1.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 3M | 499K |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 5.4M | 5.5M (2.0×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 92.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #340 | #1,241 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 34.2 | -95.6 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | May 5, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Obby & Platformer | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive, 13 for +1 Speed Slime Keyboard Escape.