Build to Survive vs Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower

Build to Survive currently leads with 5,479 concurrent players against 3,422, a 1.6Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 4,443. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405.1M vs 18.6M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ
5,479
playing now
6,607 24h peak Β· 405.1M visits
VS
Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower πŸ’ƒ
3,422
playing now
4,029 24h peak Β· 18.6M visits

Player count history

Build to SurviveWould You Rather: Emote Testing Tower

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive Would You Rather: Emote Testing TowerDifference
Playing now5,4793,4222,057 (1.6Γ—)
24h peak6,6074,0292,578 (1.6Γ—)
24h average5,2973,1372,160 (1.7Γ—)
7-day peak6,7444,4432,301 (1.5Γ—)
7-day average5,2392,7192,520 (1.9Γ—)
30-day peak6,7444,4432,301 (1.5Γ—)
All-time peak6,7444,4432,301 (1.5Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 0.3%β–² 69.0%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits405.1M18.6M386.4M (21.8Γ—)
Visits (24h)491.9K425K66.9K
Visits (7d)1.3M1.5M181.8K
Favorites10.9M1.8M9.1M (6.1Γ—)
Rating96.2%84.9%β€”
Global rank (players)#305#503of 4,380
Trending score4.153.3β€”
CreatedFeb 12, 2021Apr 13, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalObby & Platformerβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower.

Build to Survive vs Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals