Build to Survive vs [PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,969 concurrent players against 5,293. On all-time peak the record belongs to [PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape at 22,199 concurrent players, versus 7,252. Momentum favours Build to Survive: -3.2% week over week versus -27.1% for [PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (409.1M vs 58M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and [PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,969
playing now
7,252 24h peak · 409.1M visits
VS
[PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape
5,293
playing now
9,980 24h peak · 58M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive[PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | [PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,969 | 5,293 | 676 |
| 24h peak | 7,252 | 9,980 | 2,728 |
| 24h average | 5,618 | 5,711 | 93 |
| 7-day peak | 7,252 | 10,074 | 2,822 |
| 7-day average | 5,089 | 6,243 | 1,154 |
| 30-day peak | 7,252 | 10,074 | 2,822 |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 22,199 | 14,947 (3.1×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 5.5% | ▲ 7.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 3.2% | ▼ 27.1% | — |
| Total visits | 409.1M | 58M | 351.2M (7.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 515.7K | 590.7K | 75.1K |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 4.8M | 1.3M |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 88.7K | 10.8M (123.2×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 91.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #298 | #341 | of 7,929 |
| Trending score | 38.8 | -31.9 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jul 6, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive, 13 for [PETS!] +1 Pickaxe Swing Escape.