Build to Survive vs [2X] Basketball Legends
[2X] Basketball Legends currently leads with 5,421 concurrent players against 4,281. On all-time peak the record belongs to [2X] Basketball Legends at 8,518 concurrent players, versus 7,252. Momentum favours [2X] Basketball Legends: -2.7% week over week versus -4.9% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, [2X] Basketball Legends has more visits (752.8M vs 409M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and [2X] Basketball Legends is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,281
playing now
7,252 24h peak · 409M visits
VS
[2X] 🏀Basketball Legends🏀
5,421
playing now
6,510 24h peak · 752.8M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive[2X] Basketball Legends
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | [2X] Basketball Legends | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,281 | 5,421 | 1,140 |
| 24h peak | 7,252 | 6,510 | 742 |
| 24h average | 5,275 | 4,998 | 277 |
| 7-day peak | 7,252 | 7,840 | 588 |
| 7-day average | 5,013 | 4,743 | 270 |
| 30-day peak | 7,252 | 7,840 | 588 |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 8,518 | 1,266 |
| 24h change | ▲ 4.8% | ▲ 19.3% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 4.9% | ▼ 2.7% | — |
| Total visits | 409M | 752.8M | 343.8M (1.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 518.8K | 401.6K | 117.3K |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 2.9M | 621.1K |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 676.2K | 10.2M (16.2×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 86.1% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #394 | #303 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 19.4 | 19.8 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jul 31, 2023 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Sports & Racing | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Build to Survive, 12 for [2X] Basketball Legends.