Build to Survive vs Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA]
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,667 concurrent players against 4,493. On all-time peak the record belongs to Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA] at 7,871 concurrent players, versus 7,252. Momentum favours Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA]: +30.8% week over week versus -4.5% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (409M vs 178.9M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA] is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,667
playing now
7,252 24h peak · 409M visits
VS
Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA]
4,493
playing now
5,186 24h peak · 178.9M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveSorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA]
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,667 | 4,493 | 174 |
| 24h peak | 7,252 | 5,186 | 2,066 |
| 24h average | 5,378 | 4,453 | 925 |
| 7-day peak | 7,252 | 7,858 | 606 |
| 7-day average | 5,037 | 3,105 | 1,932 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,252 | 7,858 | 606 |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 7,871 | 619 |
| 24h change | ▲ 7.9% | ▲ 36.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 4.5% | ▲ 30.8% | — |
| Total visits | 409M | 178.9M | 230.1M (2.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 523.4K | 612.2K | 88.9K |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 2.8M | 675.1K |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 250.2K | 10.7M (43.7×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 97.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #380 | #400 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 25.1 | 157.2 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jun 3, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Build to Survive, 12 for Sorcerer Tower Defense [NAOYA].