Build to Survive vs The Classic Soccer
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,216 concurrent players against 216, a 24.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 6,586. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405.2M vs 99.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and The Classic Soccer is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,216
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 405.2M visits
VS
The Classic Soccer
216
playing now
6,365 24h peak · 99.2M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveThe Classic Soccer
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | The Classic Soccer | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,216 | 216 | 5,000 (24.1×) |
| 24h peak | 6,607 | 6,365 | 242 |
| 24h average | 5,281 | 2,479 | 2,802 (2.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 6,744 | 6,586 | 158 |
| 7-day average | 5,225 | 3,172 | 2,053 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 6,744 | 6,586 | 158 |
| All-time peak | 6,744 | 6,586 | 158 |
| 24h change | ▼ 7.5% | ▲ 15.9% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 405.2M | 99.2M | 306M (4.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 509.9K | 283.8K | 226.2K (1.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.4M | 952.4K | 467.2K |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 33.4K | 10.8M (325.5×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 84.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #297 | #2,307 | of 4,425 |
| Trending score | 4.0 | -73.6 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jun 5, 2023 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Sports & Racing | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for The Classic Soccer.