Build to Survive vs EMOTIA Escape [BETA]
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,300 concurrent players against 763, a 5.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 7,252 concurrent players, versus 4,285. Momentum favours Build to Survive: -6.1% week over week versus -35.7% for EMOTIA Escape [BETA]. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (409.6M vs 9.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and EMOTIA Escape [BETA] is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,300
playing now
6,972 24h peak · 409.6M visits
VS
EMOTIA Escape [BETA]
763
playing now
1,325 24h peak · 9.2M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveEMOTIA Escape [BETA]
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | EMOTIA Escape [BETA] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,300 | 763 | 3,537 (5.6×) |
| 24h peak | 6,972 | 1,325 | 5,647 (5.3×) |
| 24h average | 5,297 | 999 | 4,298 (5.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,086 | 4,173 | 2,913 (1.7×) |
| 7-day average | 4,985 | 1,263 | 3,722 (3.9×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,086 | 4,173 | 2,913 (1.7×) |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 4,285 | 2,967 (1.7×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 3.1% | ▼ 53.5% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 6.1% | ▼ 35.7% | — |
| Total visits | 409.6M | 9.2M | 400.4M (44.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 545.3K | 187.4K | 357.8K (2.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.4M | 2.1M | 1.3M (1.6×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 109.8K | 10.8M (99.6×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 94.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #350 | #1,521 | of 8,339 |
| Trending score | 23.2 | -61.6 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Nov 17, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Build to Survive, 14 for EMOTIA Escape [BETA].