Build to Survive vs [Testing] DMvsS

Build to Survive currently leads with 5,901 concurrent players against 4,431. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,783 concurrent players, versus 5,065. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405.4M vs 158.9M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and [Testing] DMvsS is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ
5,901
playing now
6,783 24h peak Β· 405.4M visits
VS
[Testing] DMvsS
4,431
playing now
5,065 24h peak Β· 158.9M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive[Testing] DMvsS

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [Testing] DMvsSDifference
Playing now5,9014,4311,470
24h peak6,7835,0651,718
24h average5,6863,7121,974 (1.5Γ—)
7-day peak6,7835,0651,718
7-day average5,3283,5811,747
30-day peak6,7835,0651,718
All-time peak6,7835,0651,718
24h changeβ–² 6.4%β–² 17.5%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits405.4M158.9M246.5M (2.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)517.8K434.4K83.4K
Visits (7d)1.7M1.6M30.1K
Favorites10.9M3.7M7.2M (3.0Γ—)
Rating96.2%81.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#320#449of 4,573
Trending score25.113.0β€”
CreatedFeb 12, 2021Jan 27, 2025β€”
GenreSurvivalActionβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for [Testing] DMvsS.

Build to Survive vs [Testing] DMvsS β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals