Build to Survive vs +1 Football for Brainrots
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,387 concurrent players against 2,980. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 7,252 concurrent players, versus 5,144. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (409.1M vs 1.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and +1 Football for Brainrots is charted above.
Build to Survive π οΈ
4,387
playing now
7,252 24h peak Β· 409.1M visits
VS
+1 Football for Brainrots
2,980
playing now
4,315 24h peak Β· 1.1M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive+1 Football for Brainrots
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | +1 Football for Brainrots | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,387 | 2,980 | 1,407 |
| 24h peak | 7,252 | 4,315 | 2,937 (1.7Γ) |
| 24h average | 4,896 | 3,014 | 1,882 (1.6Γ) |
| 7-day peak | 7,252 | 4,894 | 2,358 |
| 7-day average | 4,941 | 3,175 | 1,766 (1.6Γ) |
| 30-day peak | 7,252 | 4,894 | 2,358 |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 5,144 | 2,108 |
| 24h change | βΌ 4.7% | βΌ 13.7% | β |
| 7d change | βΌ 6.1% | β | β |
| Total visits | 409.1M | 1.1M | 407.9M (361.4Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 505.2K | 283.3K | 221.9K (1.8Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 597.3K | 2.9M (5.8Γ) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 158.7K | 10.8M (68.8Γ) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 96.8% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #396 | #605 | of 7,978 |
| Trending score | -3.3 | -17.5 | β |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jun 30, 2026 | β |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 12 days for Build to Survive, 4 for +1 Football for Brainrots.