Pilfering Pirates vs Build to Survive
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,002 concurrent players against 4,874. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 7,252 concurrent players, versus 4,917. Momentum favours Pilfering Pirates: +16.7% week over week versus -5.6% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, Pilfering Pirates has more visits (1.2B vs 409.1M). Full side-by-side history for Pilfering Pirates and Build to Survive is charted above.
Pilfering Pirates
4,874
playing now
4,917 24h peak · 1.2B visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,002
playing now
7,252 24h peak · 409.1M visits
Player count history
Pilfering PiratesBuild to Survive
Head to head
| Metric | Pilfering Pirates | Build to Survive | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,874 | 5,002 | 128 |
| 24h peak | 4,917 | 7,252 | 2,335 |
| 24h average | 4,098 | 4,999 | 901 |
| 7-day peak | 4,917 | 7,252 | 2,335 |
| 7-day average | 2,978 | 4,963 | 1,985 (1.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,917 | 7,252 | 2,335 |
| All-time peak | 4,917 | 7,252 | 2,335 |
| 24h change | ▲ 52.5% | ▼ 4.0% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 16.7% | ▼ 5.6% | — |
| Total visits | 1.2B | 409.1M | 747.3M (2.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 408K | 498.3K | 90.3K |
| Visits (7d) | 2.3M | 3.5M | 1.1M |
| Favorites | 1.4M | 10.9M | 9.5M (7.6×) |
| Rating | 84.5% | 96.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #353 | #350 | of 7,928 |
| Trending score | 134.8 | 2.7 | — |
| Created | Dec 18, 2020 | Feb 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Action | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Pilfering Pirates, 12 for Build to Survive.