Build to Survive vs +1 Stretch Escape

Build to Survive currently leads with 5,442 concurrent players against 4,274. On all-time peak the record belongs to +1 Stretch Escape at 6,905 concurrent players, versus 6,744. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405.1M vs 6.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and +1 Stretch Escape is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ
5,442
playing now
6,607 24h peak Β· 405.1M visits
VS
+1 Stretch Escape
4,274
playing now
6,905 24h peak Β· 6.1M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive+1 Stretch Escape

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive +1 Stretch EscapeDifference
Playing now5,4424,2741,168
24h peak6,6076,905298
24h average5,2974,404893
7-day peak6,7446,905161
7-day average5,2393,8251,414
30-day peak6,7446,905161
All-time peak6,7446,905161
24h changeβ–² 0.3%β–² 59.4%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits405.1M6.1M399M (66.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)491.9K697.2K205.3K
Visits (7d)1.3M2.3M974.6K (1.7Γ—)
Favorites10.9M22.1K10.8M (491.6Γ—)
Rating96.2%95.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#305#405of 4,380
Trending score4.154.8β€”
CreatedFeb 12, 2021Jun 30, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for +1 Stretch Escape.

Build to Survive vs +1 Stretch Escape β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals