Build to Survive vs Build a Zoo
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,835 concurrent players against 3,668, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build a Zoo at 13,063 concurrent players, versus 7,252. Momentum favours Build to Survive: -3.0% week over week versus -11.3% for Build a Zoo. Lifetime, Build a Zoo has more visits (521.4M vs 409.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Build a Zoo is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,835
playing now
7,252 24h peak · 409.2M visits
VS
[🌌]Build a Zoo🏆
3,668
playing now
5,665 24h peak · 521.4M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveBuild a Zoo
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Build a Zoo | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,835 | 3,668 | 2,167 (1.6×) |
| 24h peak | 7,252 | 5,665 | 1,587 |
| 24h average | 5,675 | 3,700 | 1,975 (1.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,252 | 5,665 | 1,587 |
| 7-day average | 5,103 | 3,735 | 1,368 |
| 30-day peak | 7,252 | 5,665 | 1,587 |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 13,063 | 5,811 (1.8×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 4.5% | ▲ 0.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 3.0% | ▼ 11.3% | — |
| Total visits | 409.2M | 521.4M | 112.2M |
| Visits (24h) | 506.8K | 264.6K | 242.2K (1.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 2M | 1.5M (1.7×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 3M | 7.9M (3.6×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 96.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #278 | #451 | of 8,019 |
| Trending score | 41.9 | -3.3 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jul 4, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive, 13 for Build a Zoo.