Build to Survive vs Find and Mark!
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,236 concurrent players against 3,498. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 5,514. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405M vs 58.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Find and Mark! is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,236
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 405M visits
VS
Find and Mark!
3,498
playing now
5,075 24h peak · 58.3M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveFind and Mark!
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Find and Mark! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,236 | 3,498 | 738 |
| 24h peak | 6,607 | 5,075 | 1,532 |
| 24h average | 4,954 | 3,683 | 1,271 |
| 7-day peak | 6,744 | 5,514 | 1,230 |
| 7-day average | 5,192 | 4,199 | 993 |
| 30-day peak | 6,744 | 5,514 | 1,230 |
| All-time peak | 6,744 | 5,514 | 1,230 |
| 24h change | ▼ 3.6% | ▼ 15.2% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 405M | 58.3M | 346.7M (7.0×) |
| Visits (24h) | 499.8K | 751.2K | 251.3K (1.5×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.2M | 2.6M | 1.4M (2.2×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 98.4K | 10.8M (110.3×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 93.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #369 | #455 | of 4,278 |
| Trending score | -16.9 | -43.6 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jul 3, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Party & Casual | — |
Other comparisons
Build to Survive vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 CommanderBuild to Survive vs [CUSTOM SERVERS] Sing It! Karaoke Battles [VC]Build to Survive vs Nullscape [DOOM IN BLOOM]Build to Survive vs +1 Wings Obby EscapeBuild to Survive vs +1 Muscle to Push BoulderBuild to Survive vs Drill Blocks for BrainrotsCompare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for Build to Survive, 4 for Find and Mark!.