Human Simulator vs Trains: Canyon

Human Simulator currently leads with 52 concurrent players against 39. On all-time peak the record belongs to Human Simulator at 80 concurrent players, versus 77. Lifetime, Human Simulator has more visits (31.3M vs 23.2M). Full side-by-side history for Human Simulator and Trains: Canyon is charted above.

Human Simulator
52
playing now
80 24h peak · 31.3M visits
VS
Trains: Canyon
39
playing now
77 24h peak · 23.2M visits

Player count history

Human SimulatorTrains: Canyon

Head to head

Metric Human Simulator Trains: CanyonDifference
Playing now523913
24h peak80773
24h average46406
7-day peak80773
7-day average42393
30-day peak80773
All-time peak80773
24h change 4.5% 2.6%
7d change 20.0%
Total visits31.3M23.2M8.2M
Visits (24h)5.8K6.2K444
Visits (7d)41.3K12.6K28.7K (3.3×)
Favorites184.6K27.9K156.7K (6.6×)
Rating72.7%78.6%
Global rank (players)#4,010#4,247of 7,461
Trending score10.42.6
CreatedNov 1, 2020Feb 23, 2022
GenreSimulationSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Human Simulator, 3 for Trains: Canyon.

Human Simulator vs Trains: Canyon — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals