[QOL] A Universal Time vs Slime Card Collection

Slime Card Collection currently leads with 2,978 concurrent players against 1,667, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Slime Card Collection at 3,298 concurrent players, versus 2,005. Lifetime, [QOL] A Universal Time has more visits (988.5M vs 7.3M). Full side-by-side history for [QOL] A Universal Time and Slime Card Collection is charted above.

[QOL] A Universal Time
1,667
playing now
2,005 24h peak · 988.5M visits
VS
Slime Card Collection
2,978
playing now
3,298 24h peak · 7.3M visits

Player count history

[QOL] A Universal TimeSlime Card Collection

Head to head

Metric [QOL] A Universal Time Slime Card CollectionDifference
Playing now1,6672,9781,311 (1.8×)
24h peak2,0053,2981,293 (1.6×)
24h average1,6462,6791,033 (1.6×)
7-day peak2,0053,2981,293 (1.6×)
7-day average1,5222,175653
30-day peak2,0053,2981,293 (1.6×)
All-time peak2,0053,2981,293 (1.6×)
24h change 4.4% 11.8%
7d change
Total visits988.5M7.3M981.3M (135.6×)
Visits (24h)82.5K284.2K201.7K (3.4×)
Visits (7d)302.5K969.6K667.1K (3.2×)
Favorites1.4M77K1.3M (18.4×)
Rating86.1%97.7%
Global rank (players)#989#609of 4,576
Trending score25.878.6
CreatedJun 3, 2020May 21, 2026
GenreRPGSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for [QOL] A Universal Time, 5 for Slime Card Collection.

[QOL] A Universal Time vs Slime Card Collection — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals