Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay vs Artificial Combat

Artificial Combat currently leads with 195 concurrent players against 101, a 1.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay at 434 concurrent players, versus 237. Lifetime, Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay has more visits (83.5M vs 1.6M). Full side-by-side history for Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay and Artificial Combat is charted above.

❄️🗻Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay
101
playing now
336 24h peak · 83.5M visits
VS
Artificial Combat
195
playing now
237 24h peak · 1.6M visits

Player count history

Mt. Everest Climbing RoleplayArtificial Combat

Head to head

Metric Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay Artificial CombatDifference
Playing now10119594 (1.9×)
24h peak33623799
24h average20718522
7-day peak367237130 (1.5×)
7-day average21314271 (1.5×)
30-day peak367237130 (1.5×)
All-time peak434237197 (1.8×)
24h change 15.2% 14.2%
7d change 4.9%
Total visits83.5M1.6M82M (53.3×)
Visits (24h)17.9K15.3K2.6K
Visits (7d)120K64.5K55.5K (1.9×)
Favorites504.2K25K479.2K (20.2×)
Rating75.6%79.7%
Global rank (players)#3,500#2,980of 8,339
Trending score-5.959.0
CreatedMay 4, 2019Feb 29, 2024
GenreAdventureAction

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Mt. Everest Climbing Roleplay, 7 for Artificial Combat.