Reminiscence Zombies vs [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death currently leads with 4,273 concurrent players against 1,252, a 3.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death at 10,397 concurrent players, versus 2,036. Momentum favours [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death: -21.2% week over week versus -26.8% for Reminiscence Zombies. Lifetime, [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death has more visits (326.8M vs 29.8M). Full side-by-side history for Reminiscence Zombies and [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Reminiscence Zombies | [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,252 | 4,273 | 3,021 (3.4×) |
| 24h peak | 1,551 | 7,983 | 6,432 (5.1×) |
| 24h average | 1,209 | 5,772 | 4,563 (4.8×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,681 | 8,121 | 6,440 (4.8×) |
| 7-day average | 1,021 | 6,040 | 5,019 (5.9×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,787 | 9,563 | 7,776 (5.4×) |
| All-time peak | 2,036 | 10,397 | 8,361 (5.1×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 18.4% | ▼ 11.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 26.8% | ▼ 21.2% | — |
| Total visits | 29.8M | 326.8M | 297M (11.0×) |
| Visits (24h) | 72.6K | 497.8K | 425.2K (6.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 519.9K | 3.6M | 3.1M (7.0×) |
| Favorites | 221.4K | 640.5K | 419.1K (2.9×) |
| Rating | 91.8% | 87.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #896 | #268 | of 8,338 |
| Trending score | 55.5 | -16.6 | — |
| Created | Jan 23, 2019 | Mar 8, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Reminiscence Zombies, 14 for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death.