3008 [2.74] vs Would You Rather: Singers Tower
3008 [2.74] currently leads with 13,643 concurrent players against 4,960, a 2.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to 3008 [2.74] at 19,588 concurrent players, versus 11,487. Momentum favours Would You Rather: Singers Tower: +51.9% week over week versus +8.0% for 3008 [2.74]. Lifetime, 3008 [2.74] has more visits (3.3B vs 26M). Full side-by-side history for 3008 [2.74] and Would You Rather: Singers Tower is charted above.
3008 [2.74]
13,643
playing now
18,581 24h peak · 3.3B visits
VS
Would You Rather: Singers Tower
4,960
playing now
11,487 24h peak · 26M visits
Player count history
3008 [2.74]Would You Rather: Singers Tower
Head to head
| Metric | 3008 [2.74] | Would You Rather: Singers Tower | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 13,643 | 4,960 | 8,683 (2.8×) |
| 24h peak | 18,581 | 11,487 | 7,094 (1.6×) |
| 24h average | 14,306 | 7,495 | 6,811 (1.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 19,588 | 11,487 | 8,101 (1.7×) |
| 7-day average | 14,392 | 5,494 | 8,898 (2.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 19,588 | 11,487 | 8,101 (1.7×) |
| All-time peak | 19,588 | 11,487 | 8,101 (1.7×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 5.8% | ▲ 30.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 8.0% | ▲ 51.9% | — |
| Total visits | 3.3B | 26M | 3.3B (126.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 1M | 1.2M | 133.1K |
| Visits (7d) | 7.1M | 5.8M | 1.2M |
| Favorites | 5.8M | 2.4M | 3.3M (2.4×) |
| Rating | 91.7% | 82.0% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #119 | #363 | of 7,928 |
| Trending score | -2.5 | 140.5 | — |
| Created | Jan 20, 2019 | Nov 21, 2020 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Obby & Platformer | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for 3008 [2.74], 13 for Would You Rather: Singers Tower.