3008 [2.74] vs Automate a Restaurant
3008 [2.74] currently leads with 18,365 concurrent players against 7,855, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to 3008 [2.74] at 19,588 concurrent players, versus 11,655. Momentum favours Automate a Restaurant: +37.4% week over week versus +11.9% for 3008 [2.74]. Lifetime, 3008 [2.74] has more visits (3.3B vs 5.3M). Full side-by-side history for 3008 [2.74] and Automate a Restaurant is charted above.
3008 [2.74]
18,365
playing now
19,215 24h peak · 3.3B visits
VS
Automate a Restaurant 🍲
7,855
playing now
8,784 24h peak · 5.3M visits
Player count history
3008 [2.74]Automate a Restaurant
Head to head
| Metric | 3008 [2.74] | Automate a Restaurant | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 18,365 | 7,855 | 10,510 (2.3×) |
| 24h peak | 19,215 | 8,784 | 10,431 (2.2×) |
| 24h average | 15,889 | 7,228 | 8,661 (2.2×) |
| 7-day peak | 19,588 | 11,574 | 8,014 (1.7×) |
| 7-day average | 14,790 | 8,005 | 6,785 (1.8×) |
| 30-day peak | 19,588 | 11,574 | 8,014 (1.7×) |
| All-time peak | 19,588 | 11,655 | 7,933 (1.7×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 11.3% | ▲ 4.5% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 11.9% | ▲ 37.4% | — |
| Total visits | 3.3B | 5.3M | 3.3B (614.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 983.2K | 364.6K | 618.6K (2.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 7.1M | 3M | 4M (2.3×) |
| Favorites | 5.8M | 62.6K | 5.7M (91.9×) |
| Rating | 91.7% | 98.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #100 | #248 | of 7,783 |
| Trending score | 31.2 | -37.4 | — |
| Created | Jan 20, 2019 | May 25, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for 3008 [2.74], 12 for Automate a Restaurant.