Horrific Housing vs TSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M

Horrific Housing currently leads with 2,377 concurrent players against 12, a 198.1Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Horrific Housing at 4,143 concurrent players, versus 2,218. Momentum favours TSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M: -13.0% week over week versus -16.7% for Horrific Housing. Lifetime, Horrific Housing has more visits (715M vs 17.2M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and TSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M is charted above.

Horrific Housing
2,377
playing now
2,889 24h peak Β· 715M visits
VS
πŸ’Έ TSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M
12
playing now
40 24h peak Β· 17.2M visits

Player count history

Horrific HousingTSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M

Head to head

Metric Horrific Housing TSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999MDifference
Playing now2,377122,365 (198.1Γ—)
24h peak2,889402,849 (72.2Γ—)
24h average2,243252,218 (89.7Γ—)
7-day peak3,4072,1481,259 (1.6Γ—)
7-day average2,2668961,370 (2.5Γ—)
30-day peak4,1432,1481,995 (1.9Γ—)
All-time peak4,1432,2181,925 (1.9Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 6.8%β–Ό 95.2%β€”
7d changeβ–Ό 16.7%β–Ό 13.0%β€”
Total visits715M17.2M697.8M (41.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)205.8K3.5K202.3K (59.3Γ—)
Visits (7d)1.6M944.4K676.8K (1.7Γ—)
Favorites2M2M62.4K
Rating78.2%83.1%β€”
Global rank (players)#628#4,782of 7,126
Trending score-3.4-146.0β€”
CreatedJun 27, 2015Apr 10, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 10 days for Horrific Housing, 10 for TSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M.

Horrific Housing vs TSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals