Horrific Housing vs TSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M
Horrific Housing currently leads with 2,377 concurrent players against 12, a 198.1Γ advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Horrific Housing at 4,143 concurrent players, versus 2,218. Momentum favours TSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M: -13.0% week over week versus -16.7% for Horrific Housing. Lifetime, Horrific Housing has more visits (715M vs 17.2M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and TSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M is charted above.
Horrific Housing
2,377
playing now
2,889 24h peak Β· 715M visits
VS
πΈ TSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M
12
playing now
40 24h peak Β· 17.2M visits
Player count history
Horrific HousingTSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M
Head to head
| Metric | Horrific Housing | TSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,377 | 12 | 2,365 (198.1Γ) |
| 24h peak | 2,889 | 40 | 2,849 (72.2Γ) |
| 24h average | 2,243 | 25 | 2,218 (89.7Γ) |
| 7-day peak | 3,407 | 2,148 | 1,259 (1.6Γ) |
| 7-day average | 2,266 | 896 | 1,370 (2.5Γ) |
| 30-day peak | 4,143 | 2,148 | 1,995 (1.9Γ) |
| All-time peak | 4,143 | 2,218 | 1,925 (1.9Γ) |
| 24h change | β² 6.8% | βΌ 95.2% | β |
| 7d change | βΌ 16.7% | βΌ 13.0% | β |
| Total visits | 715M | 17.2M | 697.8M (41.5Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 205.8K | 3.5K | 202.3K (59.3Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 944.4K | 676.8K (1.7Γ) |
| Favorites | 2M | 2M | 62.4K |
| Rating | 78.2% | 83.1% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #628 | #4,782 | of 7,126 |
| Trending score | -3.4 | -146.0 | β |
| Created | Jun 27, 2015 | Apr 10, 2026 | β |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 10 days for Horrific Housing, 10 for TSUNAMI TYCOON X9999999M.