Natural Disaster Survival vs Evade

Evade currently leads with 50,663 concurrent players against 13,347, a 3.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Evade at 68,583 concurrent players, versus 15,152. Momentum favours Evade: +3.4% week over week versus +1.8% for Natural Disaster Survival. Lifetime, Evade has more visits (9.1B vs 4.4B). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and Evade is charted above.

Natural Disaster Survival
13,347
playing now
13,416 24h peak · 4.4B visits
VS
Evade 🌊
50,663
playing now
61,276 24h peak · 9.1B visits

Player count history

Natural Disaster SurvivalEvade

Head to head

Metric Natural Disaster Survival EvadeDifference
Playing now13,34750,66337,316 (3.8×)
24h peak13,41661,27647,860 (4.6×)
24h average10,96447,91536,951 (4.4×)
7-day peak13,85263,91050,058 (4.6×)
7-day average10,04746,24536,198 (4.6×)
30-day peak13,85263,91050,058 (4.6×)
All-time peak15,15268,58353,431 (4.5×)
24h change 14.9% 5.7%
7d change 1.8% 3.4%
Total visits4.4B9.1B4.7B (2.1×)
Visits (24h)1.6M5.1M3.5M (3.2×)
Visits (7d)11.6M36.3M24.7M (3.1×)
Favorites11.8M8.2M3.6M
Rating90.8%93.9%
Global rank (players)#119#31of 7,928
Trending score36.816.9
CreatedMar 28, 2008Jun 10, 2022
GenreSurvivalSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 13 for Evade.