Natural Disaster Survival vs [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
Natural Disaster Survival currently leads with 10,613 concurrent players against 4,632, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Natural Disaster Survival at 15,152 concurrent players, versus 10,397. Momentum favours Natural Disaster Survival: -2.2% week over week versus -20.8% for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 326.8M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Natural Disaster Survival | [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 10,613 | 4,632 | 5,981 (2.3×) |
| 24h peak | 13,159 | 7,983 | 5,176 (1.6×) |
| 24h average | 10,627 | 5,913 | 4,714 (1.8×) |
| 7-day peak | 13,406 | 8,121 | 5,285 (1.7×) |
| 7-day average | 9,786 | 6,067 | 3,719 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 13,406 | 9,563 | 3,843 |
| All-time peak | 15,152 | 10,397 | 4,755 |
| 24h change | ▲ 8.5% | ▼ 8.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 2.2% | ▼ 20.8% | — |
| Total visits | 4.4B | 326.8M | 4.1B (13.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 1.7M | 492.2K | 1.2M (3.4×) |
| Visits (7d) | 11.5M | 3.6M | 7.9M (3.2×) |
| Favorites | 11.8M | 640.5K | 11.1M (18.4×) |
| Rating | 90.8% | 87.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #103 | #257 | of 8,338 |
| Trending score | 34.5 | -9.5 | — |
| Created | Mar 28, 2008 | Mar 8, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 14 for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death.