Natural Disaster Survival vs Eat the World

Natural Disaster Survival currently leads with 11,189 concurrent players against 4,171, a 2.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Natural Disaster Survival at 15,152 concurrent players, versus 5,261. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 615.5M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and Eat the World is charted above.

Natural Disaster Survival
11,189
playing now
15,152 24h peak · 4.4B visits
VS
Eat the World
4,171
playing now
4,747 24h peak · 615.5M visits

Player count history

Natural Disaster SurvivalEat the World

Head to head

Metric Natural Disaster Survival Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now11,1894,1717,018 (2.7×)
24h peak15,1524,74710,405 (3.2×)
24h average11,3234,0687,255 (2.8×)
7-day peak15,1525,2409,912 (2.9×)
7-day average9,9103,8466,064 (2.6×)
30-day peak15,1525,2409,912 (2.9×)
All-time peak15,1525,2619,891 (2.9×)
24h change 43.4% 1.3%
7d change
Total visits4.4B615.5M3.8B (7.1×)
Visits (24h)1.7M387.1K1.3M (4.3×)
Visits (7d)5.6M1.4M4.1M (3.9×)
Favorites11.8M27.8M16M (2.4×)
Rating90.8%94.7%
Global rank (players)#127#381of 4,380
Trending score57.720.7
CreatedMar 28, 2008Feb 22, 2024
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 5 for Eat the World.

Natural Disaster Survival vs Eat the World — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals