Natural Disaster Survival vs Catalog Emotes Testing

Natural Disaster Survival currently leads with 10,431 concurrent players against 2,665, a 3.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Natural Disaster Survival at 15,152 concurrent players, versus 5,281. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 29.3M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and Catalog Emotes Testing is charted above.

Natural Disaster Survival
10,431
playing now
15,152 24h peak · 4.4B visits
VS
Catalog Emotes Testing ✨
2,665
playing now
4,491 24h peak · 29.3M visits

Player count history

Natural Disaster SurvivalCatalog Emotes Testing

Head to head

Metric Natural Disaster Survival Catalog Emotes TestingDifference
Playing now10,4312,6657,766 (3.9×)
24h peak15,1524,49110,661 (3.4×)
24h average11,0483,3527,696 (3.3×)
7-day peak15,1525,2479,905 (2.9×)
7-day average9,8523,4816,371 (2.8×)
30-day peak15,1525,2479,905 (2.9×)
All-time peak15,1525,2819,871 (2.9×)
24h change 39.0% 4.4%
7d change
Total visits4.4B29.3M4.4B (150.1×)
Visits (24h)1.6M501K1.1M (3.3×)
Visits (7d)5.6M1.4M4.2M (4.1×)
Favorites11.8M236.6K11.5M (49.7×)
Rating90.8%83.7%
Global rank (players)#139#544of 4,425
Trending score49.0-13.0
CreatedMar 28, 2008Jun 4, 2026
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 4 for Catalog Emotes Testing.

Natural Disaster Survival vs Catalog Emotes Testing — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals