Natural Disaster Survival vs Jump To Steal Soccer Players
Jump To Steal Soccer Players currently leads with 20,366 concurrent players against 12,460, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Jump To Steal Soccer Players at 58,675 concurrent players, versus 15,152. Momentum favours Jump To Steal Soccer Players: +16.9% week over week versus +1.9% for Natural Disaster Survival. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 33.3M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and Jump To Steal Soccer Players is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Natural Disaster Survival | Jump To Steal Soccer Players | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 12,460 | 20,366 | 7,906 (1.6×) |
| 24h peak | 13,442 | 58,675 | 45,233 (4.4×) |
| 24h average | 11,086 | 23,951 | 12,865 (2.2×) |
| 7-day peak | 13,852 | 58,675 | 44,823 (4.2×) |
| 7-day average | 10,066 | 25,398 | 15,332 (2.5×) |
| 30-day peak | 13,852 | 58,675 | 44,823 (4.2×) |
| All-time peak | 15,152 | 58,675 | 43,523 (3.9×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 15.3% | ▼ 0.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 1.9% | ▲ 16.9% | — |
| Total visits | 4.4B | 33.3M | 4.4B (132.4×) |
| Visits (24h) | 1.6M | 2.6M | 1M (1.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 11.6M | 19.2M | 7.6M (1.7×) |
| Favorites | 11.8M | 1.1M | 10.7M (11.0×) |
| Rating | 90.8% | 85.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #124 | #72 | of 7,929 |
| Trending score | 40.9 | -24.9 | — |
| Created | Mar 28, 2008 | Jul 23, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 13 for Jump To Steal Soccer Players.