Artificial Combat vs Drive the ball to the end

Artificial Combat currently leads with 142 concurrent players against 92, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Artificial Combat at 203 concurrent players, versus 191. Lifetime, Drive the ball to the end has more visits (54.5M vs 1.5M). Full side-by-side history for Artificial Combat and Drive the ball to the end is charted above.

Artificial Combat
142
playing now
177 24h peak · 1.5M visits
VS
Drive the ball to the end
92
playing now
157 24h peak · 54.5M visits

Player count history

Artificial CombatDrive the ball to the end

Head to head

Metric Artificial Combat Drive the ball to the endDifference
Playing now1429250 (1.5×)
24h peak17715720
24h average1248539
7-day peak19115734
7-day average1308446 (1.5×)
30-day peak20315746
All-time peak20319112
24h change 6.8% 4.9%
7d change
Total visits1.5M54.5M53M (35.7×)
Visits (24h)9.8K16.8K7K (1.7×)
Visits (7d)24.7K27.9K3.2K
Favorites24.5K10.1M10M (411.8×)
Rating79.7%83.4%
Global rank (players)#3,260#3,496of 7,215
Trending score-8.21.8
CreatedFeb 29, 2024May 5, 2025
GenreActionObby & Platformer

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Artificial Combat, 3 for Drive the ball to the end.

Artificial Combat vs Drive the ball to the end — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals