Artificial Combat vs No Jumping Tower

No Jumping Tower currently leads with 139 concurrent players against 68, a 2.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Artificial Combat at 203 concurrent players, versus 192. Lifetime, No Jumping Tower has more visits (20.8M vs 1.5M). Full side-by-side history for Artificial Combat and No Jumping Tower is charted above.

Artificial Combat
68
playing now
177 24h peak · 1.5M visits
VS
No Jumping Tower
139
playing now
192 24h peak · 20.8M visits

Player count history

Artificial CombatNo Jumping Tower

Head to head

Metric Artificial Combat No Jumping TowerDifference
Playing now6813971 (2.0×)
24h peak17719215
24h average1011065
7-day peak1911921
7-day average11510114
30-day peak20319211
All-time peak20319211
24h change 21.7% 14.0%
7d change
Total visits1.5M20.8M19.3M (13.6×)
Visits (24h)9.4K21.2K11.9K (2.3×)
Visits (7d)27.6K43.2K15.6K (1.6×)
Favorites24.5K22.5K2K
Rating79.7%91.7%
Global rank (players)#3,794#3,295of 7,327
Trending score-20.48.2
CreatedFeb 29, 2024Jul 23, 2025
GenreActionObby & Platformer

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Artificial Combat, 3 for No Jumping Tower.

Artificial Combat vs No Jumping Tower — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals