A Simple Obby? vs [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death

[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death currently leads with 6,681 concurrent players against 2,184, a 3.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death at 10,397 concurrent players, versus 5,725. Momentum favours A Simple Obby?: +69.9% week over week versus -19.2% for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death. Lifetime, [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death has more visits (326.7M vs 151.6M). Full side-by-side history for A Simple Obby? and [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death is charted above.

A Simple Obby?
2,184
playing now
3,889 24h peak · 151.6M visits
VS
[⏰FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
6,681
playing now
7,983 24h peak · 326.7M visits

Player count history

A Simple Obby?[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death

Head to head

Metric A Simple Obby? [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of DeathDifference
Playing now2,1846,6814,497 (3.1×)
24h peak3,8897,9834,094 (2.1×)
24h average2,4346,6154,181 (2.7×)
7-day peak5,6858,1212,436
7-day average2,5326,1953,663 (2.4×)
30-day peak5,6859,5633,878 (1.7×)
All-time peak5,72510,3974,672 (1.8×)
24h change 43.0% 2.5%
7d change 69.9% 19.2%
Total visits151.6M326.7M175.1M (2.2×)
Visits (24h)204.7K488.6K283.9K (2.4×)
Visits (7d)1.7M3.6M2M (2.2×)
Favorites235.2K640.4K405.2K (2.7×)
Rating49.8%87.3%
Global rank (players)#688#209of 8,339
Trending score-13.025.8
CreatedMar 18, 2018Mar 8, 2025
GenreObby & PlatformerSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for A Simple Obby?, 14 for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death.